Which enterprise architecture framework is often used to define the organizational context of business processes and their link to strategic objectives?

The TOGAF (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is widely recognized for its comprehensive approach to enterprise architecture, specifically in bridging the gap between business needs and IT solutions. One of its key strengths is its focus on aligning organizational processes with strategic objectives, which is achieved through its Architecture Development Method (ADM). This method outlines a structured process for developing an enterprise architecture that supports the organization’s goals and ensures that business processes are effectively integrated with overarching strategic plans.

TOGAF emphasizes the importance of understanding the organizational context, including business drivers, stakeholder concerns, and existing capabilities, which are critical in defining business processes. Through its various phases, from preliminary architecture to architecture governance, TOGAF helps organizations identify how their processes can support strategic initiatives, enabling better decision-making and resource allocation.

In contrast, other frameworks like the Zachman Framework, while also valuable, serve different purposes and might not explicitly focus on the direct alignment of business processes to strategic objectives. The Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF) is oriented towards U.S. government agencies and addresses specific regulatory needs, while the Gartner Framework is more focused on IT-related concerns rather than the holistic view of organizational processes and strategy. Thus, TOGAF stands out as the most suitable choice for defining the